Following along the lines of similar victories in San Francisco and New York,
U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf in Lincoln [Nebraska] said that Congress ignored the most experienced doctors in determining that the banned procedure would never be necessary — a finding he called "unreasonable."The failure to include an exception to protect the health of the mother doomed the bill, Kopf ruled.
"According to responsible medical opinion, there are times when the banned procedure is medically necessary to preserve the health of a woman and a respectful reading of the congressional record proves that point," Kopf wrote. "No reasonable and unbiased person could come to a different conclusion."
As LeanLeft notes, anti-choice people won't agree to such an exception because
once you make that concession ... you've admitted that abortion is sometimes acceptable; and you've established that the life and interests of the woman are of more value than those of the fetus she carries,which is much the same thing as I said on Sunday. GMTA and all that.
No comments:
Post a Comment