Sunday, April 09, 2017

17.6 - RIP: Gilbert Baker

RIP: Gilbert Baker

This week, we have an RIP for someone of who, unless you were a dedicated political activist, you very likely have never heard.

Gilbert Baker
His name was Gilbert Baker, and he was found dead in his New York apartment on March 31. He died of heart disease. He was 65.

After being in the Army as a medic and nurse, he taught himself to sew - which is relevant because of the reason his passing is worth noting:

In 1978, Gilbert Baker created the rainbow flag, the flag which has become the internationally-recognizable symbol of LGBTQ pride and LGBTQ rights. So much so that four days after the historic Supreme Court decision guaranteeing the right of same-sex couples to marry, the White House was lit up in rainbow colors - and no one needed to ask why.

So RIP, Gilbert Baker.

17.5 - Good News/Not Good News: Virginia repeals part of HB2

Good News/Not Good News: Virginia repeals part of HB2

Related to that, we also have a sort of Good News/Not Good News bit.

North Carolina has repealed parts of HB2, the state's notorious "bathroom bill." Specifically, it repealed the part that required transgender people use public restrooms, showers, and locker rooms that match the gender on their birth certificate rather than their gender identity. The repeal shows that public pressure and economic boycotts can in fact be tools for change and comes against the background of a recent poll commissioned by the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute which showed 53% of Americans opposing laws like HB2.

That's the Good News part. The Not Good News part is that the bill, which Gov. Roy Cooper has signed, maintains the prohibition on local anti-discrimination measures. That is, cities and towns in the state cannot enact local legislation to protect transgender and other LGBTQ folks in their jurisdictions from the discrimination they now face in areas like employment, housing, and health care. One small gain is that the ban is now temporary, supposedly expiring in 2020; another is that local governments can set LGBTQ protections for their own employees and contractors, even though they can't set them for the public at large.

Still, when we recall that this started because Charlotte passed an ordinance to protect the rights of transgender people and that the state responded with HB2, getting the bathroom part out while leaving the ban on local legislation intact amounts to a case of two steps back and one step forward.

A bit of connected disappointing news is that the NCAA, which had threatened to bar North Carolina from hosting championship events if HB2 was not overturned by the end of March, has "reluctantly" agreed to consider bids from the state because the new law "meets the minimal NCAA requirements."

The NCAA had been calling for a complete repeal and I regret that it didn't stand firm on that.

17.4 - Good News: Appeals Court supports rights of transgender people

Good News: Appeals Court supports rights of transgender people

In a major victory for human rights, on April 4, for the first time ever, a US appeals court ruled that federal civil rights law protects LGBTQ people from discrimination in the workplace.

The case involves Kimberly Hively, who was passed her over for a permanent position at Ivy Tech Community College in South Bend, Indiana and lost her position as an adjunct professor there. She accused the school of acting because school administrators learned she is a lesbian and sued the school, claiming a violation of her civil rights.

She lost in district court in Indiana and before a panel of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, which threw out her suit on the grounds that LGBTQ folks are not protected by federal laws against sex discrimination because they are not specifically mentioned there.

Kimberly Hively
But now the entire court has ruled 8-3 that, quoting
We conclude today that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination.
A dramatic statement of a simple truth.

This does not mean that Hively has won her suit; she still has to show that the school acted as it did because she is lesbian. But it does mean the suit can go forward - and no matter how her suit turns out in the end, the recognition of discrimination based on gender identity to be a form of sex discrimination remains, and remains an important breakthrough.

17.3 - Good News: celebrating resistance

Good News: celebrating resistance

Another bit of Good News is filed under the heading "Celebrating Resistance." A new coalition calling itself "The Majority" is emerging with the intent of building a, quoting its statement,
"multi-racial, cross-movement fight for justice, freedom and the right to live fully, with dignity and respect."
The movement takes its inspiration from Martin Luther King's famous speech of 50 years ago - April 4, 1967 - when he explicitly broke with the Lyndon Johnson administration on the Vietnam War and directly linked the war to what he called "the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism," declaring that the suffering and poverty of the people of Indochina are linked to the suffering and poverty of the poor and minorities in the US.

Put more simply, we're all in this together.

The Majority includes more than 50 organizations focusing on racial and economic justice, including Black Lives Matter Global Network, Mijente, Fight for $15, Indigenous Environmental Network, and many more, and is planning for a series of local forums and actions leading up to a strike on May Day, May 1.

I hate to keep harking back to the dreaded '60s, but one of the things that gave the time its dynamism and the social movement its power was the recognition that all of our various struggles - over the war, over racism and sexism, over poverty, over the environment, over still more - were connected, were parts of a greater overall struggle for justice. It's something the Occupy Movement, with it's idea of the 1%, also grasped, at least to some extent, but something that frankly I think progressives have mostly lost sight of over the past several decades and so it's exciting and encouraging - and Good News - to see it re-emerge.

17.2 - Footnote: Arkansas to create "assembly line of death"

Footnote: Arkansas to create "assembly line of death"

As a Footnote to that, here's a quick reminder of why this remains important, that we as a nation remain enamored of death.

Starting on April 17, Arkansas is scheduled to execute 11 people in eight days in what Rita Sklar, executive director of the Arkansas ACLU, accurately called "a ghastly assembly line of death."

And why the rush? Some legal - no cruel pun intended - deadline? Well, there is a time issue, but it's not a legal one. It's because the state's supply of midazolam, one of the drugs used by the state in the process of poisoning the prisoners, expires on April 30. So it's a case of "Omigosh! If we don't kill them now, we won't have another chance until we don't know when! So hurry up!"

What makes this all the stranger is that Arkansas has not carried out a death sentence in over 11 years, during which time its murder rate has actually declined slightly or at least remained just about the same.

In fact, 31 states still have this remnant of medieval barbarity on the books, even though, happily, it is being imposed less and less - but that's a trend that Arkansas seems determined to reverse.

17.1 - Good News: Alabama limits power to impose death penalty

Good News: Alabama limits power to impose death penalty

Let's start the week with some Good News.

Alabama is currently the only state in the US that allows for what's called judicial override in cases involving the death penalty. What that means is that a judge can sentence a convicted defendant to death even if a jury has specifically rejected that choice.

Alabama is also the only state where a defendant can be sentenced to die by the vote of 10 of 12 jurors. Every other state with the death penalty requires that decision to be unanimous. No doubt partly as a result, Alabama historically has executed more defendants than states five times its size.

Happily, the state is about to take one step back from that. The state legislature has passed a bill ending the practice of judicial override. It now goes to Gov. Robert Bentley, who is expected to sign it - and even if he doesn't, the bill passed by margins well beyond what is needed to override a veto.

After the Supreme Court struck down a similar (but not identical) sentencing regime in Florida in 2016, Alabama became the last state to have judicial override for the death penalty. Now, the practice soon will no longer exist in the US.

Yes, Alabama still has the death penalty, but as I said last week, I think anything that throws a brick into the machinery of legal murder is Good News.

What's Left #17




What's Left
for the week of April 6 to 12, 2017

This week:

Good News: Alabama limits power to impose death penalty
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/alabama-judicial-override-ends_us_58c83063e4b09cd957673398?

Footnote: Arkansas to create "assembly line of death"
http://www.salon.com/2017/04/04/assembly-line-of-death-arkansas-is-going-to-execute-8-people-over-an-11-day-stretch/
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/jurisdictions-no-recent-executions
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/murder-rates-nationally-and-state#MRalpha
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/states-and-without-death-penalty

Good News: celebrating resistance
http://www.alternet.org/activism/diverse-protest-groups-unite-majority-aiming-large-scale-demonstrations-may-1st
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/058.html
http://www.mcall.com/opinion/yourview/mc-martin-luther-king-vietnam-speech-50th-anniversary-lang-yv-0403-20170402-story.html

Good News: Appeals Court supports rights of transgender people
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/04/04/us-civil-rights-law-protects-lgbt-workers-from-workplace-bias/22026101/

Good News/Not Good News: Virginia repeals part of HB2
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/30/522009335/north-carolina-lawmakers-governor-announce-compromise-to-repeal-bathroom-bill
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/03/10/poll-americans-oppose-bathroom-laws-limiting-transgender-rights/21879293/
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Steven-Petrow-You-can-t-compromise-on-civil-11043391.php
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/NCAA-NC-back-in-running-to-host-events-after-law-11048783.php

RIP: Gilbert Baker
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/gilbert-baker-whose-rainbow-flag-flew-over-the-rise-of-gay-rights-dies-at-65/2017/04/01/07becbe8-16e5-11e7-833c-503e1f6394c9_story.html?utm_term=.a0fc7e51e399

For the Record: a brief comment on the gas attack in Syria
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/04/04/days-after-tillerson-mouths-russian-line-on-syria-assad-uses-gas.html
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/04/05/an-infantile-argument-experts-pour-cold-water-on-russias-fanciful-explanation-syrian-gas-attack/22027154/
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/04/04/white-house-blames-obama-administration-assad-regime-chemical-attack-syria/22025672/
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/politics/tillerson-haley-syria-assad-turkey

Update: progress on implementing Colombian peace accord
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2017/01/86-good-news-of-year-2016-peace.html
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/03/31/colombias-farc-rebels-give-up-guns-in-disarmament-camps/22020673/
http://colombiareports.com/evidence-indicates-colombia-military-bribing-farc-rebels-abandon-peace-process/
https://panampost.com/julian-villabona/2017/03/22/colombian-armed-conflict-despite-farc-peace-deal/

Footnote: mudslides in Colombia kill hundreds
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-39469033
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-39478189
http://colombiareports.com/farc-caused-south-colombia-flooding-disaster-opposition-senator/

Clown Award: Pennsylvania state Senator Scott Wagner
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/global-warming-report-sunday-shows_us_5884ca53e4b070d8cad322b3
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/09/politics/scott-pruitt-global-warming-human/
https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2017/03/28/wagner-keynotes-for-natural-gas-advocates-in-harrisburg/
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17228-why-is-the-earth-moving-away-from-the-sun/
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/89424/how-much-does-increased-world-population-contribute-to-global-warming

Outrage of the Week: new illegal Israeli settlement
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2004/11/yasser-arafat.html
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2004/10/and-this-is-why-in-lot-of-ways-it-wont.html
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2004/07/peas-in-pod.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-palestinians-settlement-idUSKBN1711K6
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/middleeast/israel-approves-new-settlement/

Saturday, April 01, 2017

16.10 - Clown Award: a majority of American men

Clown Award: a majority of American men

Finally for the week, it's our other regular feature, the Clown Award, given as always for meritorious stupidity. Sometimes it's given for something outrageous or creepy or yeah, downright stupid, but sometimes it's given just because of a "duh" moment.

With that in mind, the winner of the Big Red Nose this week is: a majority of American men.

According to a new survey by the nonpartisan polling firm PerryUndem, the majority of Americans hold fairly progressive views on reproductive rights.

For example, 74 percent of voters don't want to defund Planned Parenthood, 63 percent oppose restricting access to abortion care, and 83 percent want to keep the Medicaid expansion. Some 75 percent think that if men were the ones who got pregnant, Congress would keep the birth control benefit in health care instead of talking about repealing it.

So why the clown award?
Okay, it's the best I could find

Because of one particular question that got results that just really struck me as shake-your-head weird. Men were asked "Have you benefitted personally from any woman in your life having access to affordable birth control?" Some 52 percent of men said "no."

Guys - what?

You haven't benefitted? You haven't benefitted from not having an unwanted pregnancy in your marriage or relationship? You haven't benefitted from not having an unwanted child in your marriage or relationship? You haven't - how should I say this - benefitted from having the fear of an unwanted pregnancy removed from a let's call it potential relationship?

Dudes, get a clue!

On just about if not everything else in the survey, you proved yourselves progressive, much more progressive than members of the US public are thought to be. But on this one, that failure to connect the brightly-lit and numbered dots left you looking like, sorry guys, clowns.

16.9 - Hero Award: Aramis Ayala

Hero Award: Aramis Ayala

Next up, another of our occasional features. It's the Hero Award, something we give out as the occasion arises to someone who just does the right thing on a matter big or small.

Earlier in the show I said I regarded any obstruction thrown in the way of the death penalty to be good news. So this certainly counts.

Our Hero is Aramis Ayala, the State Attorney for Orange-Osceola counties in Florida. On March 16 she announced that her office will no longer seek the death penalty as a sentence in any case in which it is involved.

Ayala, the first African-American in Florida history to be elected a prosecutor, said the death penalty provides no safety benefits to the public or law enforcement, is not a deterrent, winds up costing more than life in prison, and gives victims' families false hope for closure, among other reasons.

Bear in mind that Florida is home to death-loving "Stand Your Ground" laws and has as a governor Rick Scott, the secret identity of Voldemort. Florida loves death almost as much as Texas does.
Aramis Ayala

So it should not be a surprise that reaction from Florida officialdom was swift and hostile. Gov. Voldemort pulled her off the case and the judge in the case was so eager to get the possible killing started that he would not even delay case until Ayala could get a ruling on her claim that Voldemort had no lawful authority to remove her.

What's more, the GOPpers who dominate the state legislature propose to cut her budget by $1.3-1.4 million and eliminate 21 staff positions for daring to exercise her prosecutorial authority in a less bloodthirsty way than they want.

How this will play out from here remains to be seen. What is clear is that Aramis Ayala has chosen the correct side of justice and history and pointed up, even if unintentionally, how the death penalty is not about justice but bloody vengeance. And for that, she is a Hero.

16.8 - For the Record: items considered quickly

For the Record: items considered quickly

Next up, we have For the Record, our occasional feature where we cover some bits of news very quickly, just to make sure they gets mentioned. So:

For the Record, leaked documents show that Daniel Pantaleo, the New York cop who killed Eric Garner with a banned chokehold in July 2014, should have been fired long before that incident. Before he choked Garner to death over a claim of selling untaxed cigarettes, Pantaleo had seven disciplinary complaints lodged against him plus four individual allegations substantiated by an independent review board. None of them lead to any significant punishment.

For the Record, a couple of computer geeks have set up a website called MakeTweetsGreatAgain where people can sign up to donate anywhere from 10 cents up to the ACLU every time Donald TheRump sends out a tweet. So far over $1600 has been raised. They also let him know via Twitter how much each one of his tweets - which in his case really should be called twits - is worth.

Finally, For the Record, the annual African Global Economic and Development Summit, which is about trade between the US and African nations, was held in Los Angeles March 16-18. One thing was missing: Africans. Every one of the invited delegates from Africa, about 100 of them, had been denied a visa.

16.7 - Outrage of the Week: TheRump attacks the climate

Outrage of the Week: TheRump attacks the climate

All that talk about profit and the corrosive effect of chasing it leads us right to one of our regular features, the Outrage of the Week.

Here's a thought: Do you really think that TheRump's destruction of programs aimed at limiting - or even measuring - climate change is about climate? or science?

Of course not, any more than it's about jobs. It's about profit. It's about the profit of the fossil fuel industry. It's about the pursuit of profit, about the pursuit of profit overwhelming, driving out, all other considerations, even the future of the planet.

Upton Sinclair once wrote that "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it." And for some within the fossil fuel industry, perhaps especially the coal miners fearing their jobs will evaporate and their communities along with them, that may be true. But in considering the higher-ups, the corporate gods, in considering C. S. Lewis's quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who work in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices and do not need to raise their voices, he was much too polite.

Because they do understand. And they have understood.

Shell Oil knew of the dangers of global climate change by 1986. They even produced a video about it in 1991.

Exxon-Mobil, Exxon at the time, knew about the risks no later than 1981. Not only did they do nothing about it, the corporation actively funded the nanny-nanny naysayers on global warming for the next 27 years.

They knew. They know. And they just don't care. Because caring would mean caring about something other than profit.

And it's that profit that TheRump is serving.

His Executive Order, issued on March 28, aims to undermine and roll back every move the executive branch has made or even proposed to make over the past several years regarding climate change. It intends to demolish a wide array of recent policies on global warming - including emissions rules for power plants, limits on methane leaks, a moratorium on federal coal leasing, factoring the social cost of carbon into government actions, and any and all regulations that "burden" the production of coal, oil, gas, or nukes. He even is rescinding an order urging federal agencies to help communities strengthen their ability to deal with climate impacts.

It is so nonsensically extreme that not only has information on climate change been scrubbed from the White House website but the Energy Department's Office of International Climate and Clean Energy has banned the terms "climate change," "emissions reduction," and "Paris Agreement" from all written communications.

Michael Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, went as far as to say at a press briefing on TheRump's budget proposal that "we're not spending money on [climate research] anymore; we consider that to be a waste of money."

It is wholesale, deliberate, conscious rejection not only of facts, not only of science, but of knowledge itself. It is, in other words, a wholesale, deliberate, conscious abandonment of our collective future to satisfy the present-day desire for profit by the fossil fuel industry.

So yes, the pursuit of profit, when profit becomes the goal, not the means, becomes the point, not the tool, yes, it is evil and it is destructive. And it is promoting the destruction of our environment now and into the future. And that most certainly is an outrage.

16.6 - The love of profit is the root of all economic evil

The love of profit is the root of all economic evil

Because that's the focus for them. That's the deal for them. That's the whole game for them: a little more profit, a few more bucks, even if - maybe especially if - those bucks can be squeezed out of the lowest-paid workers, the politically and economically weakest workers, the ones most desperate for work, the ones who out of necessity will go along with and put up with whatever is inflicted on them.

I said it a year and a-half ago: The pursuit of profit is the baseline cause of economic injustice. It is the baseline cause of income inequality, the baseline cause of poverty, the baseline cause of unemployment, the baseline cause of homelessness, the baseline cause of hunger.

The pursuit of profit does not allow for the common good, it does not allow for the advancement or the benefit of the community as a whole, it does not allow for "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few - or the one." In fact, the pursuit of profit declares the opposite: not even the needs, but the desires of the one outweigh the needs of all the rest.

That is the way they think. That is what the corporate elite, the 1%, the economic powers of our nation, the Masters of the Universe, however you refer to them, this is how they really think. They hold that profit is not only its own reward, it is its own justification, and that everything else, including ethics and the law, must fall before it.

THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOU! They never have and they never will. You are just a tool for their gain, a means to their end.

Profit itself is not evil. Recall that the statement from the Bible is not "money is the root of all evil," but "the love of money is the root of all evil." In a similar way, profit is not the root of inequality, poverty, and hunger, but the pursuit of profit, where making profit is itself the goal, is the root of inequality, poverty, and hunger; is destructive; is evil.

Consider the example of the so-called "New Detroit." That's a nickname Alabama has been trying on ever since 1997 when a Mercedes-Benz assembly line opened near Tuscaloosa, followed by Toyota, Honda, and Hyundai opening Alabama plants of their own.

With them came the auto parts makers. Alabama's burgeoning auto parts industry employs 26,000 workers, who in 2016 earned $1.3 billion in wages. It seemed like the relief the nation's 5th-poorest state had been dreaming of.

But Bloomberg News looked at records of OSHA - the Occupational Safety and Health Administration - which told of the human cost involved. The companies would make promises of delivery schedules impossible to meet and then demand the employees make good on those promises, forcing them to work insanely long hours, as much as 12 hours a day, six or seven days a week, for months on end, sometimes demanding they work on dangerous machinery for which they had had no training, in utter disregard for their health and welfare.

Hourly pay is low, turnover is high, and safety is an afterthought. In fact, safety violations often were ignored because it was cheaper to ignore the warnings and pay the fine than to fix the problem; proft was more important than the lives and safety of the employees.

As a result, quoting the article,
OSHA records document burning flesh, crushed limbs, dismembered body parts, and a flailing fall into a vat of acid. The files read like Upton Sinclair, or even Dickens.
Adam Wolfsberger, a former manager at a temp agency that supplied workers to one of the parts manufacturers, said the companies "treated people like interchangeable parts."

Which is to be expected because that's all they are, that's all you are, to the bosses: interchangeable parts. Wear one out then get another one cheap.

We now live in a national economy where inequality has grown steadily over the past four presidents; indeed it has grown steadily since the 1970s.

We live in a national economy where after eight years of supposed recovery, poverty is still higher than it was in 2009 and in fact higher than almost every given year since at least 1981.

We live in a national economy where the typical CEO makes 276 times as much as the typical worker. As recently as about 1965, it was only 20 times as much. And believe it of not, that 276 times is an improvement: Around the year 2000, it was 376 times as much.

We live in a national economy where real median household income has gone up just 5.5% since 1989.

And we live in a world economy where in 2010, just 43 people owned as much wealth as half of the world's population - and where in 2017 that number has dropped to just eight. Eight people - all men - now own as much wealth as half the world's population. That is the world we live in.

They do not care about you and they will not care about you. All they care about is "more." And they do not care about the price you have to pay for them to get it.

We need to realize that we are on our own, that the bosses and politicos will only respond when, how, and to the degree we make them respond, and we must stand up for ourselves because they will not stand up for us.

16.5 - Right-wing trying to change rules on minimum wage

Right-wing trying to change rules on minimum wage

And speaking of the minimum wage, it provides another example of what I keep telling you: The right-wing attitude is that if they lose under the rules, then you have to change the rules to suit them.

In November, voters in four states approved referendums raising the minimum wage in their respective states. Excellent news for low-wage workers and for the economies of those states.

But in three of those states - Arizona, Maine, and Washington - corporations have been using the courts and their influence over state legislatures to in an effort to undo what the voters did.

In one of those states - Arizona - they have already lost: On March 14 the Arizona state Supreme Court unanimously rejected a suit by business groups trying to have the November victory overturned on a technicality.

Arizona is also the state, by the way, that as I mentioned last show is responding to victories via citizen initiative by trying to make it as hard as possible for one to ever get on the ballot in the future.

Meanwhile, a corporate lawsuit in Washington about the minimum wage is still pending, with the first hearing scheduled for April 3.

And in Maine, the state legislature, lobbied by the state Restaurant Association, is changing that state's new minimum wage law in a way to benefit the industry by reinstating the "tip credit," under which tips can be counted toward meeting the wage requirement.

The public voted to have that credit be phased out stating in 2018. But that's not what the corporations want and the legislature may well be prepared to do their bidding.

16.4 - Not Good News: $15 minimum wage vetoed in Baltimore

Not Good News: $15 minimum wage vetoed in Baltimore

And unfortunately we also have some Not Good News this week, which serves as a reminder that even as movements gather strength, there will be setbacks.

In this case, the movement is the "Fight for $15," the push for a livable minimum wage, and the setback came on March 24 when Baltimore Mayor Catherine Pugh vetoed legislation which would have raised the city's minimum wage to $15 per hour. Although the city council could override the veto, that is considered unlikely.

Pugh made the same claims that opponents of wage increases always make, that it would damage the economy, that it would cost jobs, that it would drive out businesses, and no matter how many times history shows that to be untrue, no matter how many cities raise their minimums only to find the fearsome predictions did not come true - Seattle, San Francisco, and Los Angeles being recent examples - still the same arguments get raised.

Pugh said cities and towns should wait for the state of Maryland. And of course just as cities claim they will lose to surrounding towns if they raise their minimums, states in turn claim they will lose to surrounding states. And so the buck gets passed to the feds, who just do nothing even as the actual buying power of the federal minimum wage sits below where it was in 1969.

And so the millions of adults who are paid minimum or low wages continue to lose ground. Because we dare not offend business.

16.3 - Good News: resistance to corruption in Russia

Good News: resistance to corruption in Russia

One more bit of Good News: Resistance grows.

On March 26, in the biggest show of defiance in five years, public opposition to corruption and rigged elections saw tens of thousands of people turn out in scores of demonstrations all across Russia.

Almost all of those rallies were "unsanctioned," that is, they had neither permission nor permits, but still people poured into the streets in cities from Vladivostok to St. Petersburg.

Moscow
The largest rally was, not surprisingly, in Moscow. Police estimated that 7000-8000 people took part there, with another 3000 in St. Petersburg, with crowds of hundreds or more in many other places.

It has to be said, though, that considering photos of the events it seems clear that those police estimates are woefully low and opposition estimates of 20,000 in Moscow and 10,000 in St. Petersburg are closer to the mark.

Nationwide, over 1000 people were arrested, with the bulk of the arrests in Moscow.

The demonstrations resulted from a call by anti-corruption campaigner Alexei Navalny, described as a complex and charismatic figure who has long been a thorn in the Kremlin's side.
St. Petersburg

He has alienated some of Russia's liberal democrats with his anti-migrant rhetoric and his participation in rallies organized by neo-Nazis and white supremacists, but he is highly popular among Russians critical of the corruption in the Kremlin.

By the way, as a quick footnote to that to be filed under "same as it ever was," or if you prefer, "mirror, mirror," is that when RT, a Russian state-owned media outlet, reported on the demonstrations, the lead comment on the story was "Soros and US have been busy then!!!" and yes, they did mean George Soros. Many other comments were along the lines of "Soros is behind it all," the protesters are "a small minority," Navalny is "a CIA stooge," and the protesters were "paid."

Made me feel right at home.

16.2 - Good News: victory on the death penalty

Good News: victory on the death penalty

Another bit of Good News comes again, from the Supreme Court. Must be that spring is in the air and everyone is feeling giddy.

On March 28, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas, a state inordinately fond of the death penalty, used an obsolete standard in determining whether a defendant has an intellectual disability that would preclude execution.

That case was that of Bobby Moore, 57, convicted 37 years ago of fatally shooting a grocery store clerk during a robbery.

The Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that the execution of people who are intellectually disabled violates the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In this case, the justices ruled 5-3 that Texas's system for assessing the intellect of defendants is deficient and not based on  medical expertise.

The case was sent back to lower courts for a reassessment of Moore's mental capacity.

The victory here may be temporary - Moore could still be sentenced to death on re-hearing - but I regard any block jammed into the machinery of the death penalty to be good news.

16.1 - Good News: victory on disability rights

Good News: victory on disability rights

Starting the week, as we always like to do, with some Good News, this time it arises out of a place that has not been and I fear for some time to come will not be the source of much Good News: the Supreme Court.

The case involves a family outside Denver with a child with a learning disability. He attended public school from kindergarten through fourth grade, during which time he was given specialized instruction to deal with his learning and behavioral issues.

His parents then placed him in a private academy that specialized in autism because they were frustrated with his lack of progress. There, his behavior and learning improved markedly.

The parents then sued the school for reimbursement for the cost of the specialized education, charging that the school had not met its obligations under the law for a "free appropriate public education" for children with disabilities.

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals said no, finding that the school must offer "merely more than de minimus" to meet its obligations - that is, it is only required to offer something beyond the absolute minimum.

The Good News is that on March 22, a unanimous Supreme Court said that's not good enough, that children with disabilities have a right to an "educational program that is reasonably calculated to enable [them] to make progress" and one which "must be appropriately ambitious in light of" the child's capabilities.

To do otherwise, to be satisfied with with "merely more than de minimus" as a standard, to aim so low, would, the Court said, "be tantamount to sitting idly awaiting the time" when students with disabilities "were old enough to drop out."

On response, some people claimed it would cost too much. If we can find an extra $54 billion to kill people, we can find a fraction of that to help people learn.

What's Left #16




What's Left
for the week of March 30 - April 5, 2017

This week:

Good News: victory on disability rights
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/03/22/high-court-bolsters-rights-learning-disabled-students.html
http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-essential-washington-updates-supreme-court-rules-for-children-with-1490202454-htmlstory.html

Good News: victory on the death penalty
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/03/28/supreme-court-rules-for-texas-death-row-inmate-over-iq-claim/22015198/

Good News: resistance to corruption in Russia
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/nationwide-protests-bring-thousands-to-russias-streets/2017/03/26/7e3af598-128b-11e7-bb16-269934184168_story.html?utm_term=.dcb767264b97
https://www.rt.com/news/382381-russia-opposition-protests-detentions/
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/26/521594477/russians-take-to-the-streets-in-nationwide-anti-government-protests
http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-russia-protests-20170326-story.html

Not Good News: $15 minimum wage vetoed in Baltimore
http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/26/dem-mayor-vetoes-15-min-wage-bill/
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/pass-the-buck.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/who-actually-earns-the-minimum-wage/

Right-wing trying to change rules on minimum wage
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/03/11/minimum-wage-advocates-won-big-in-november-but-now-theyre-at-risk-of-losing-all-over-again/
http://www.thestand.org/2017/03/early-i-1433-results-are-in-raising-minimum-wage-boosts-jobs/
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/23/1645780/--SaveTheWage-Protect-Minimum-Wage-Raises-from-Corporate-Lobbyists-and-Lawyers
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/minimum-wage-supreme-court-backs-voters-over-business-interests-9163185
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2017/03/1511-update-repressing-protest.html

The love of profit is the root of all economic evil
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2015/10/2227-pursuit-of-profit-is-baseline.html
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1-Timothy-6-10/
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-03-23/inside-alabama-s-auto-jobs-boom-cheap-wages-little-training-crushed-limbs
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/26/during-obamas-presidency-wealth-inequality-has-increased-and-poverty-levels-are-higher/
http://www.epi.org/publication/the-top-charts-of-2016-13-charts-that-show-the-difference-between-the-economy-we-have-now-and-the-economy-we-could-have/
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N
http://fortune.com/2017/01/16/world-richest-men-income-equality/

Outrage of the Week: TheRump attacks the climate
https://thecorrespondent.com/6285/shell-made-a-film-about-climate-change-in-1991-then-neglected-to-heed-its-own-warning/692663565-875331f6
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/08/exxon-climate-change-1981-climate-denier-funding
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/7/8/1400557/-Former-Exxon-scientist-says-Exxon-knew-about-climate-change-and-fossil-fuels-in-1981
http://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/3/27/14922516/trump-executive-order-climate
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/11/06/2013-26785/preparing-the-united-states-for-the-impacts-of-climate-change
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/03/16/press-briefing-press-secretary-sean-spicer-3162017-25
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/03/trumps-war-on-the-climate-begins/519159/


For the Record: Daniel Pantaleo should have been fired long ago
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/22/1646219/-Leaked-documents-show-the-NYPD-officer-who-killed-Eric-Garner-should-have-been-fired-a-long-time-ago

For the Record: MakeTweetsGreatAgain
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/03/27/1647743/-Thanks-to-these-computer-developers-when-Trump-tweets-the-ACLU-gets-a-donation
https://maketweetsgreatagain.us/

For the Record: forum on trade with Africa included no Africans
https://www.indy100.com/article/africa-trade-meeting-african-visa-denied-us-travel-ban-global-economic-development-summit-7637666

Hero Award: Aramis Ayala
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/92813296-132.html
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/breaking-news/os-aramis-ayala-no-death-penalty-20170316-story.html
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2017/03/28/judge-backs-scotts-removal-of-prosecutor/amp/
http://www.wesh.com/article/florida-legislators-propose-cutting-budget-of-state-attorney-aramis-ayala/9196886

Clown Award: a majority of American men
https://www.scribd.com/document/342699692/PerryUndem-Gender-and-Birth-Control-Access-Report
https://thinkprogress.org/congress-is-more-regressive-on-womens-rights-than-most-voters-poll-finds-88efc93d7e59#.t6051vj6e

Saturday, March 18, 2017

15.12 - Update: government spying on citizens

Update: government spying on citizens

Finally, last week I also talked some about privacy in a digital age, specifically, government intrusions into that privacy.

Here's another aspect of that.

Court records have revealed that the FBI has recruited and paid technicians at Best Buy's Geek Squad to do deep scans of the hard drive of computers brought in for service and report anything they find that seems sketchy to them.

Defenders of the practice argue that when you bring in a computer for service, you allow the technicians access to your hard drive and if they find something criminal - kiddie porn is the example invariably thrown up - it's their obligation to report it.

Which is all true and all completely irrelevant because here we are not talking about accidentally finding criminal material, we are talking about people actively looking for it - and no, contrary to what I have seen claimed, except for some potential unusual circumstances, you do not have to actually examine the content of de-allocated sectors on a hard drive in order to service it. You may see something is an image file or a text file, but you do not have to view the image or read the text to do your job - unless your job is to be a paid snoop for the feds.

Two bits of advice: encrypt your data and don't go to Geek Squad.

15.11 - Update: repressing protest

Update: repressing protest

Next up, last week I referred to my Rules for Right-wingers, with #18 being "If you lose by the rules, change them." I listed a number of recent attempts by right-wingers to change the rules to shut down public opposition to their regimes.

Turns out I missed one.

Arizona has seen some progressive victories lately through the use of citizen initiatives, including an increase in the minimum wage and a paid leave measure in November. So the reactionaries in control of the legislature want to make it harder for such initiatives to get on the ballot.

One measure would ban campaigns from paying petition gatherers by the signature, which would sharply increase the cost of mounting a petition campaign by removing any incentive for the gatherers to maximize the number of signatures they get. GOPpers claim this is to prevent fraud but since signatures are validated before a measure is approved for the ballot, that is obvious nonsense.

Another proposal, which could be an even bigger hurdle, is to require that for a measure to quality for the ballot, in each and every one of the state's 30 legislative districts the petitions must have signatures totalling at least 10% of the vote for governor in that district.

Finally, there is a provision in the state constitution that the legislature can't alter a voter-approved law in a way that would undermine the law's intent. The GOPpers are trying to get rid of that provision.

15.10 - Update: DAPL

Update: DAPL

Some updates on things I've talked about recently.

First, I said just a couple of weeks ago that "the stench of corruption ... continues to thicken" around the drive to build the Dakota Access pipeline, the DAPL. It just thickened some more.

When the Army Corps of Engineers released an Environmental Impact Statement about the project last August, it included a controversial conclusion regarding environmental justice issues that "the proposed [pipeline] would not disproportionately affect identified minority or low-income populations."

It now turns out, based on court records, that the source for that bit of supposed analysis was not the Corps of Engineers. It was the pipeline's builders, Dakota Access LLC and its contractor, HDR Inc.

And how did the corporation reach that oh-so-convenient conclusion? Not by examining the economic status of the Standing Rock Sioux and the impact an oil leak could have on the community's drinking water and agriculture, but by making comparisons with other low-income communities in the state. And because the pipeline would "cross less than the overall state average of 12 percent of impoverished populations," that, they said, meant the pipeline does not disproportionately impact low-income populations. And if that wasn't enough of a slammer, the report also argued that the route would impact one percent fewer Native Americans and Alaska Natives than a previously considered route.

So, see? No problem of environmental justice!

In other words, the corporations didn't look at actual potential environmental and cultural impacts, they just looked at population sizes as if that was the whole issue.

Then that self-serving corporate assessment was largely wrapped into the Army Corps impact statement.

This whole thing just stinks.

15.9 - For the Record: vibrator company tracks product use

For the Record: vibrator company tracks product use

For the Record, here's something just in case you hadn't heard about it.

A company called We-vibe sells a vibrator that can be remotely operated via a smart phone "so you can be together even when you're not," as they say in their ads.

What they didn't say either in the ads or when some customer bought the thing is that the app involved would send to the company's servers the date and time it was used, how and for how long it was used, and the registered users' email addresses.

The company has agreed to a nearly $4 million settlement in a class-action suit.

15.8 - For the Record: best country in the world?

For the Record: best country in the world?

For the Record, maybe the US isn't #1 after all.

When people tell me the US is the best country in the world, I always ask what is the seventh best - because to say we're the best, you have to have some kind of objective standard.

Well, it turns out that every year US News and World Reports puts together such a list. It worked with the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a consulting firm to develop on a set of standards based on how each country is perceived by the world at large.

The US, it develops, ranked, yes, seventh on the list this year, a drop of three slots from last year. And it ranked that high because of scoring high on power, entrepreneurship, and cultural influence - in other words, the military, corporations, and Hollywood. Outside of those three, it ranked no higher than 16 on any other measure.

God bless America.

15.7 - For the Record: resistance continues

For the Record: resistance continues

Three brief items filed under our occasional feature, For the Record, where we cover something quickly to make sure it gets mentioned.

First, For the Record, the resistance continues.

On March 14, a movement called Resist Trump Tuesdays turned out hundreds of people in places including Kansas City, Medford, Oregon, and 250 in snow and cold in Racine, Wisconsin as well as other places around the country. And several thousand turned out in Nashville TN on March 15 in response to an appearance there by TheRump to promote his "kill public schools" plan.

Carry it on.

15.6 - Clown Award: TIME magazine

Clown Award: TIME magazine

Our third runner-up is Steve Fitzgerald, a state senator in Kansas. A woman was dissatisfied with the response he gave to her concerns about recent anti-abortion-rights legislation in the state - so she donated money to the regional chapter of Planned Parenthood in his name.

The organization sent him a thank you and he responded with a letter calling Planned Parenthood "heinous," saying this was worse than having his name associated with Dachau, and shame on everybody for attempting to "blacken [his] name."

I think you're doing a pretty good job of that on your own, Stevie-boy.

Our second runner-up is Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill.

On March 5, he spoke in support of Alabama's voter ID law. Now it's bad enough that voter ID laws address a non-existent problem - voter impersonation at the polls - with the actual intent of suppressing the minority vote, but he made this statement at the Brown Chapel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Selma, Alabama, during a service to commemorate the 52nd anniversary of the "Bloody Sunday" march when police attacked nonviolent civil rights marchers on the city's Edmund Pettus Bridge.

On the other hand, in 2016, Merrill claimed that automatic voter registration would "cheapen" the work of civil rights leaders - because, apparently, respecting them means making it as hard as possible for minorities to register - and he called Confederate symbols on government buildings a monument to "a way of life that makes us special and unique." So this is par for the course for him.

Our first runner-up takes us from one dark part of the universe to another: Wall Street. You likely know of the iconic statue of the charging bull there. As you may have heard, there is a new statue there, that of a young girl defiantly facing off against the bull. It was placed there just before International Women’s Day by State Street Global Advisors, the world's third-largest asset manager, as a call for companies to include more women on their boards.

A laudable goal and the statue has already become a favorite of visitors to the street.

So the day after International Women's Day, this happens: Some wall street lacky-type who an onlooker described as right out of central casting, proceeds to hump the statue while his friends cheer him on.

Crude, boorish, simulated sexual violence. Always good for a laugh.

Quick Footnote: Apparently some people were disturbed about the photo being posted on social media. According to eyewitnesses, he did this not only in front of his friends but about 15 to 20 onlookers. He's got no business complaining.

Footnote to the Footnote: When "Inside Edition" covered this story, they blurred the creep's face. I didn't.

What, who, would be worse, more clownish that that? The answer is our winner: "Time" Magazine.

Amal Clooney is an accomplished, international human rights lawyer who made a powerful speech to the UN General Assembly on March 10 calling on the world body to investigate human rights crimes by ISIS in Iraq, especially against the Yazidis, a religious minority who ISIS regards as devil worshippers to be wiped out. She specifically called on Iraq's Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi to send a letter to the Security Council so it can vote to begin investigating those crimes.

And how did Time decide to tweet about this story? Just look to the left. Yup. That way.

They weren't the only ones, but while we might - emphasize might - expect it from outfits like "Entertainment Tonight" or "E! News" or tabloids like The Mirror in the UK, to see it from as establishment and mainstream a publication as Time just serves to emphasize how deep-rooted and pervasive sexism in our media really is.

"Time" Magazine: You have really proven yourselves to be a complete miniature car full of clowns.

15.5 - Ya Gotta Just Laugh: TheRump supporters think ad for sci-fi series is real radio station

Ya Gotta Just Laugh: TheRump supporters think ad for sci-fi series is real radio station

This is an occasional feature, filed under the heading of Sometimes all you can do is laugh.

On its streaming TV service, Amazon is running an adaptation of a 1962 novel called The Man in the High Castle by noted sci-fi author, the late Philip K. Dick. It's an alternative history story in which the Allies lost World War II to the Axis at least partly because Germany got "the Bomb" first. The story is set in 1962 and the US has been divided into an eastern zone controlled by Germany, a western zone controlled by Japan, and a lawless neutral zone between. There, a fledgling resistance movement is trying to get started.

As part of the advertising for the show, Amazon set up a website called resistanceradio.com featuring three looped streams supposedly from three pirate radio stations that are part of the show's fictional world. The company also set up a sponsored hashtag on Twitter, #ResistanceRadio.

Well, apparently a number of TheRump supporters heard about this and without even looking at the site, without doing one bit of thinking or checking, stomped over to Twitter to complain about the "liberal bias" of this non-existent station and to fume about "lefty loonies" who "would rather USA fail then admit Trump does anything good" and are "resisting facts like Trump is President."

It's true: sometimes all you can do is laugh.

15.4 - Footnote: even TheRump is for "clean water"

Footnote: even TheRump is for "clean water"

Last week I mentioned that among the achievements of the movement of the '60s was to change, perhaps not by much but certainly permanently, our society's sense of its relation to the environment.

Consider as evidence for that the fact that even TheRump has to talk about wanting clean water and hasn't proposed doing away with the Clean Water Act itself so we could go back to the days of Lake Erie being dead, the Cuyahoga River catching fire, and living in Boston meant you really did have to love that dirty water.

Small moves may be small moves - but they are moves.

15.3 - Not Good News: TheRump goes after clean water rules

Not Good News: TheRump goes after clean water rules

But even "sorta" Good News is better than Not Good News, and we have some of that, too.

Specifically, we have the intent of TheRump to turn back the clock on clean water by undoing the so-called Clean Water Rule.

The Clean Water Act of 1972 protects the "waters of the US" - major water bodies like large streams, rivers, bays and other coastal waters, along with streams and wetlands that flow into them - from being destroyed or polluted, or at least polluted without federal oversight and control.

The question always has been just how extensive is that reach, that is, just how far does the definition of "waters of the US" extend?

The issue came to a head in 2006 in the case Rapanos v. United States, involving a developer who wanted to fill in wetlands to build a shopping center. It resulted in a messy 4-1-4 split at the Supreme Court, with four right-wing justices taking a very narrow view of what the law covered, four others taking a more expansive view, and Anthony Kennedy trying to stake out a middle ground. In the absence of a majority, the controlling view became Kennedy's, who said that waters with a "significant nexus" to those clearly covered by the Act were themselves covered.

Which leaves another problem: What constitutes a "significant nexus?"

The Obama administration tried to answer that question with a rule-making effort that took over four years to get from a draft in 2011 to a final form in 2015. Relying on scientific research, the final Clean Water Rule said the law's protection extended to what are called "intermittent" waters, those that flow only certain times of the year, such as during snow melts, and "ephemeral" waters, those that flow in response to a weather event such as a rainstorm, provided they have other features of streams, such as banks and a bed.

The support for this position lies in the fact that according to the EPA, upwards of two-thirds of US stream miles are intermittent or ephemeral and that about 117 million Americans draw all or some of their water from public drinking water systems that depend at least partly on such sources and that such waters, along with the headwaters of streams, are hydrologically connected, that is, they do have a "significant nexus," with those larger streams and rivers clearly covered by the law.

The Clean Water Rule has never gone into effect because it was blocked in federal court while a suit against it proceeds, meaning those waters remain without protection.

Which is bad enough, but it gets worse.

On February 28, TheRump issued an executive order that not only indicated that the administration will no longer defend the Clean Water Rule in court but ordered the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers, the two agencies involved in interpreting and enforcing the Clean Water Act, to review and revise the rules.

And not just in order to, as was expected, roll back the Clean Water Rule, but to adopt the standard used by the right-wing justices in the Rapanos case, one not only weaker than the standard the Obama administration proposed but even weaker than the one the Bush administration adopted in the wake of Rapanos.

That is a standard which not only would exempt intermittent and ephemeral streams from protection, but would even strip protection from wetlands that lack a direct surface flow consistently connecting them to perennial streams or lakes - those that always have water - even though many wetlands have their connection to those streams and lakes through underground flow or via aquifers. It would also deny protection to the headwaters that are the sources of those perennial streams. All, apparently, under the insane notion that water does not flow downhill and so you can pollute or damage upstream without affecting downstream.

The silver lining in this dark cloud is that the Clean Water Rule isn't going away any time soon. TheRump's order allows the EPA to begin the lengthy rulemaking process - but the whole process is something which the New York Times suggests could take more time than he has left in his first term.

Even so, this is clearly an indication of the attitude the White House cabal takes to issues of environmental protection and likely presages future assaults on environmental regulations.

And that, most certainly, is not good news.

15.2 - Good News: more support for drug importation bill

Good News: more support for drug importation bill

We have one other bit of Good News which I am calling "sorta Good News." Good News with a question mark, if you will.

A few weeks ago, I told you about an attempt by Sens. Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar, and some others to allow pharmacists to import drugs from Canada - and how despite attracting the support of a dozen GOPpers the measure failed because 13 Dimcrats voted against it.

One of that demon's dozen, Cory Booker, took the brunt of the heated reaction because of his status as the liberal hero du jour.

Well, the Good News part is that Booker is co-sponsoring a new version of the bill along with Sanders and Amy Klobuchar - as are three others among those who voted against it before. That means that if all the GOPper support from before holds, they have 50 votes and a real chance of passage, at least in the Senate.

Booker, as a politician who sits in their office dreaming of being president someday will, insisted that the criticism had nothing to do with his change of heart. It was, he insisted, that he won inclusion of additional safety standards in the bill, because of course it goes without saying that the protection of the American public was his real concern, not the boatload of campaign contributions he has gotten from the pharmaceutical industry.

Still, he is on the right side now. But this is where the Good News becomes the "sorta" Good News. Some of those so-called "safeguards" are actually loopholes for Big Pharma. Two in particular stand out, one relatively minor, the other important:

The minor one is that that foreign sellers can only sell drugs manufactured in an FDA-registered facility. That would effectively limit things to reimportation of drugs made in the US and exported to Canada. That's not a significant limitation, since most of the drugs that would be involved would fit that description - that is, most of the meds would be ones that are being reimported. That again raises the question about the supposed need for additional safety regulations since we are talking for the most part about US-manufactured drugs (not to mention the implied slam against Canada's own standards), but leave that aside.

The other requirement is that foreign sellers of drugs would have to be certified by the US Secretary of Health and Human Services. That would means that the White House could effectively totally block the importation of meds from Canada simply by not getting around to certifying any such foreign sellers or by finding fault with every application for certification.

All of which means that the move to allow for the importation of medications from Canada is back on track - but with enough PSs and footnote to make Big Pharma smile. So yes, I would have to call this "sorta" Good News.
 
// I Support The Occupy Movement : banner and script by @jeffcouturer / jeffcouturier.com (v1.2) document.write('
I support the OCCUPY movement
');function occupySwap(whichState){if(whichState==1){document.getElementById('occupyimg').src="https://sites.google.com/site/occupybanners/home/isupportoccupy-right-blue.png"}else{document.getElementById('occupyimg').src="https://sites.google.com/site/occupybanners/home/isupportoccupy-right-red.png"}} document.write('');