Saturday, February 15, 2014

146.3 - Unintentional Humor: Francois Hollande "powers others only dream of"

Unintentional Humor: Francois Hollande "powers others only dream of"

Ah, we have another example of our occasional feature, Unintentional Humor, where something that's not intended to be funny, just is.

This comes via a good catch by the media watchdog group FAIR.

Time magazine just published a long piece about French President Francois Hollande. The headline is "Meet Monsieur Reform," and the piece makes the predictable argument that his turn to the right is a good idea, because in the minds of the so-called mainstream media, moving to the political right is always a good idea,  no matter the circumstanes.

In this case, according to the article's subhead, "the world needs him to succeed," which of course placating and embracing the right wing will accomplish. They say.

But here's the thing; this was the first paragraph of the story:
French presidents don't so much govern as reign from the splendors of the Élysée Palace. They have powers most democratic leaders only dream of, able to deploy their military or command nuclear strikes without first consulting the national legislature.
So in France, the president can take military action without consulting the legislative branch?

Really?

What a singular place that must be.

I can't imagine a president claiming that kind of power.

Like the man said, sometimes ya just gotta laugh so you don't cry.

One other thought: Has Time magazine ever heard of drones?


Sources:
http://www.fair.org/
http://www.fair.org/blog/2014/02/07/you-wont-believe-what-they-let-the-president-do-in-france/
http://quotes.dictionary.com/I_hasten_to_laugh_at_everything_for_fear
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/02/6-unanswered-questions-obama-drones

Sources for headlines:
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/clinton-tells-house-obama-would-ignore-war-resolutions.php
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/world/middleeast/syria.html?hp

146.2 - Good news: Moral Monday is back

Good news: Moral Monday is back

My other feel-good story comes from North Carolina, where Moral Monday is back.

I've mentioned this three or four times, the first time last summer. The capitol grounds in Raleigh became the site of weekly protests and nonviolent civil disobedience on a variety of topics ranging from Medicaid expansion and unemployment benefits through natural gas drilling and school vouchers to voting rights and abortion rights. Depending on the topic and the weather, crowds numbered from dozens to thousands.

The marches were suspended for a while when the legislature was not in session.

But now they are back. And back big. A rally to mark the anniversary of one of the founding actions of the civil rights era, the day when four black college students sat down at a "whites only" counter in a Woolworth's in Greensboro, North Carolina and ordered coffee, drew an estimated 80,000-100,000 people. It was the largest civil rights rally in the South since the Selma to Montgomery march in 1965.

The fact that people are carrying it on, carrying it on in places like Wisconsin and North Carolina where they have have to absorb so many body blows over the past several years, absorbing the blows and even fighting back, it makes me feel good and it keeps my hope up. It's good news.

Sources:
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2013/07/left-side-of-aisle-116-part-2.html
http://www.thenation.com/blog/178291/north-carolinas-moral-monday-movement-kicks-2014-massive-rally-raleigh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greensboro_sit-ins
http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/encyclopedia/enc_selma_to_montgomery_march/

146.1 - Good news: "Solidarity Singalong" arrests found unconstitutional

Good news: "Solidarity Singalong" arrests found unconstitutional

I've got two related stories - or rather stories with a common theme - that just make me feel good.

The first comes from Wisconsin. Way, way back in August I told you about the Solidarity Singalongs taking place in the rotunda of the state capitol building in Madison. The songs were protests of the anti-worker policies of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walkalloveryou. At that time, in August, walker started having people arrested for singing, claiming it was an "illegal assembly," and even people who were merely watching were threatened with arrest. Around 400 people in total were arrested.

And now those arrests have all been struck down.

A state judge had declared that the administrative rule used for the arrests is unconstitutional. In a wonderful line, the judge quoted another, older case, in which it was said that
[a]n unconstitutional law is void, and is as no law. An offense created by it is not a crime. A conviction under it is not merely erroneous, but is illegal and void, and cannot be a legal cause of imprisonment.
Let the singing continue!

Sources:
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2013/08/left-side-of-aisle-120-part-5.html
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/05/1275428/-Unconstitutional-Unintimidated-in-Wisconsin?detail=email
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/05/1275373/-Dane-County-WI-Judge-Declares-Rule-Used-to-Charge-Singers-Unconstitutional

Left Side of the Aisle #146




Left Side of the Aisle
for the week of February 13-19, 2014

This week:

Good news: "Solidarity Singalong" arrests found unconstitutional
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2013/08/left-side-of-aisle-120-part-5.html
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/05/1275428/-Unconstitutional-Unintimidated-in-Wisconsin?detail=email
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/05/1275373/-Dane-County-WI-Judge-Declares-Rule-Used-to-Charge-Singers-Unconstitutional

Good news : Moral Monday is back
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2013/07/left-side-of-aisle-116-part-2.html
http://www.thenation.com/blog/178291/north-carolinas-moral-monday-movement-kicks-2014-massive-rally-raleigh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greensboro_sit-ins
http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/encyclopedia/enc_selma_to_montgomery_march/

Unintentional Humor: Francois Hollande and "powers others only dream of"
http://www.fair.org/
http://www.fair.org/blog/2014/02/07/you-wont-believe-what-they-let-the-president-do-in-france/
http://quotes.dictionary.com/I_hasten_to_laugh_at_everything_for_fear
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/02/6-unanswered-questions-obama-drones
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/clinton-tells-house-obama-would-ignore-war-resolutions.php
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/world/middleeast/syria.html?hp

Keystone XL and the jobs lie
http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/221135.pdf
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/11/us-usa-keystone-idUSBREA1A23S20140211
http://content.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2014/01/statement-state-department-walks-away-significant-impact-new-keystone-xl
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-marx/reject-the-keystone-xl-pi_b_4761072.html
http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/02/14/5-myths-about-keystone-xl-debunked/192668#jobs
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=keystone+xl+vigil
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2010/04/theodore-roosevelt-malefactors-of-great-wealth.html

Update: GOPpers still trying to push Iran sanctions bill
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/05/gop-will-force-reid-to-save-obama-s-iran-policy-over-and-over-again.html
http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/197722-aipac-breaks-with-gop-on-iran-sanctions

Clown Award: Drug Free America Foundation
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/07/drug-free-america-foundation-marijuana_n_4745691.html
pic.twitter.com/cLc0nsQCcr
http://www.gallup.com/poll/165539/first-time-americans-favor-legalizing-marijuana.aspx

Outrage of the Week: unemployment benefits, SNAP, and the minimum wage
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/06/unemployment-extension-senate_n_4739526.html
http://money.cnn.com/2014/01/20/news/economy/unemployment-insurance/
http://www.worldhunger.org/articles/Learn/us_hunger_facts.htm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/30/us-child-poverty-report-unicef_n_1555533.html
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/197291-sessions-says-food-stamp-cuts-not-deep-enough
http://money.cnn.com/2014/01/17/news/economy/food-stamps-cut/index.html?iid=EL
http://money.cnn.com/2013/10/25/news/economy/food-stamp-cuts/index.html?iid=EL
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/government-oversight/197761-republicans-want-photo-id-requirement-for-food-stamps
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/23/1271896/-Republicans-believe-rich-people-just-work-harder-So-how-do-they-explain-these-statistics
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/27-shocking-numbers-that-reveal-the-true-state-of-the-union-20140128
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42973.pdf
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/opinion/sunday/the-case-for-a-higher-minimum-wage.html
http://www.epi.org/minimum-wage-statement/

Friday, February 07, 2014

145.8 - Outrage of the Week: Still how they think of you

Outrage of the Week: Still how they think of you

Now for our other regular feature, the Outrage of the Week. This week's Outrage might be called Chapter 2 of "This is how they think of you." Last week we had Thomas Perkins, this week we have Marijn Dekkers, CEO of the multinational pharmaceutical corporation Bayer.

In 2005, the FDA granted approval for a promising new cancer drug for treating late-stage kidney and liver cancer. The drug, called Nexavar, is now marketed by Bayer.

The problem with the drug, as is often the case with drugs, is that it's incredibly expensive. On the international market, a year's supply of the drug costs about $69,000. In the US, it's about $96,000.

Now, that's not a problem for the rich, nor is it one for those fortunate enough to have good health insurance, which will shield them from most of the cost. But it is a problem for who knows how many people worldwide who could be helped by the medication but can't even imagine affording it - which is true even here in the US among the millions with no or inadequate insurance, who would face a yearly cost roughly double the median annual income.

Well, India, where $69,000 is 41 times the country's annual per capita income, has an answer. Patent laws there allow another company to produce a generic version of the drug if the brand-name version is not available at a price most can afford. In 2012, Indian pharmaceutical company Natco Pharma Ltd. applied for just such a license, and got it. The company began producing and marketing the drug at a cost of just $177 a year.

Enter Mr. Dekkers.

Besides the expected response of calling the court decision "essentially theft" even though it's entirely in line with Indian patent law which we can assume Bayer was aware of, Dekkers told a recent Financial Times conference that, quoting him,
Is this going to have a big effect on our business model? No, because we did not develop this product for the Indian market, let’s be honest. We developed this product for Western patients who can afford this product....
In other words, Dekker said that "We don't give a damn about Indians or anyone else in the developing world. We don't give a damn about poor people. Even though we could sell this at $177 a year and make a profit, which we know because there is a company doing it, we just don't care. We only care about Westerners, in fact we only care about Westerners who are rich enough - or have insurance companies rich enough - to pay our insanely inflated prices and if you can't afford those prices you can just go ahead and die in pain."

That is how they think of you. And while Dekkers' attitude isn't a surprise - a 2012 report from Doctors Without Borders found that most pharmaceutical companies devote only a small fraction of their budgets to fighting diseases that disproportionally affect and kill the world’s poor people, so the attitude is no surprise - that changes neither it's cold-blooded indifference or the fact that it's an outrage.

Sources:
http://jobsanger.blogspot.com/2014/01/bayer-ceo-thinks-poor-people-dont.html
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/01/26/3205861/pharmaceutical-ceo-cancer-drug-westerners-afford/
http://doctorswithoutborders.org/events/symposiums/2012-lives-in-the-balance/assets/files/Medical-Innovations-for-Neglected-Patients.pdf
http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/

145.7 - Syria: Remember I told you so

Syria: Remember I told you so

Back in September, when there was a settlement emerging with Syria to destroy its stocks of chemical weapons, I talked about the how the US had been taking steps to destroy its own stocks of such weapons since the 1990s, that it had promised to complete that process by 2012, and that it had failed. In fact, the most recent forecast is that the process of "neutralizing" our chemical weapons stocks won't be completed until 2023 - 11 years later than our own self-imposed deadline in a process that already has taken around 20 years. And I urged you to keep that fact in mind when the first complaints came up about Syria being behind schedule in destroying its own stocks.

I'm here today to say I told you so.

On January 30, Secretary of War Chuck Hagel said he was "concerned" that Syria was behind schedule in turning over its chemical weapons for destruction and told reporters Syria "had to take responsibility for fulfilling its commitment."

Meanwhile, the US ambassador to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons - which is running a joint mission with the UN to oversee the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons - claimed that the effort had "seriously languished and stalled" and that "the spotlight is on Syria."

The agreement to destroy these weapons was only reached on September 27 and the deadline for completing the process is June 30, but already the US, which is going to miss its own voluntary, self-imposed deadline by 11 years, is saber-rattling over a deadline for Syria which hasn't even come yet. I warned you. I did.

By the way, something to put this in even more context: Another nation which, like the US, voluntarily gave up and destroyed its chemical weapons is Libya, which just completed doing so the end of January. It took a full 10 years. Meanwhile, Syria is expected to get rid of all its chemical weapons in less than nine months, in the middle of a civil war. I can't help but wonder if that requirement is intended to be unattainable.

And by the way, just to make it abundantly clear, I am not defending Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad against anything except the possibility that Syria is being set up to fail on destroying its chemical weapons stocks on schedule in order to justify inflicting more war, more violence, more bloodshed on that country.

Beyond that, he will get no defense from me; rather, I will make note of things such as the recent report from Human Rights Watch that describes how he has "deliberately and unlawfully" demolished thousands of homes, in some cases entire neighborhoods, in opposition strongholds in Syria as a form of collective punishment, which is yet another war crime in his string of war crimes.

Sources:
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2013/09/1262-scary-notion-that-president-can.html
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/11/us-syria-chemical-weapons-destruction
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25968616
http://www.opcw.org/
http://opcw.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=6576&ctl=Details&mid=10358&ItemID=19898&language=en-US
http://www.opcw.org/news/article/libya-completes-destruction-of-its-category-1-chemical-weapons/

145.6 - The State of the Keystone

The State of the Keystone

The Keystone XL pipeline is back in the news. I have talked about this several times, most recently in December. This is the pipeline intended to carry 830,000 gallons of tar sands oil a day from Alberta, Canada, to refineries in Texas. From there, the refined oil will be exported to be sold on the international market.

The reason it's in the news again is that the State Department has issued its report on the pipeline. State was involved because the project crosses an international boundary. Supporters of the pipeline are saying the report gives Obama no real choice but to approve its construction. And at first glance, based on the spin it's being given, that could seem to be the case.

However, there is a real problem with the report: It attempts to change the subject, or, more exactly, to change what question is being asked.

In Obama's climate speech last June, he said to be approved the pipeline must be in the national interest and that would only be true if, his words now, "this project does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution."

Okay, but what constitutes "significant?"

Tar sands pit
You have to remember that tar sands are about the ugliest, messiest, dirtiest way to get oil there is; the stuff is so thick, gummy, and sludgy it has to be heated - that is, you have to melt it - and mixed with water just to get it to flow though the pipes. The EPA has determined that on a well-to-tank basis, oil from tar sands produces 82% more greenhouse gas emissions than conventional crude oil does: nearly double. Which certainly sounds significant to me.

However, that State Department report has its own notion of what "significant" means: It concluded that the Keystone XL pipeline would not significantly affect overall greenhouse gas emissions because the oil will be transported through other means if the pipeline isn't built.

In the words of the report,
approval or denial of any one crude oil transport project, including the proposed Project, is unlikely to significantly impact the rate of extraction in the oil sands or the continued demand for heavy crude oil at refiners in the United States....
Which frankly is like arguing that there is no significant danger to smoking cigarettes because one more cigarette is not going to significantly change your risk of getting lung cancer.

The point is, the report changed the question. Instead of asking if, in the light of climate change, it's in our national interest to help promote and expand use of the dirtiest oil source there is, it restricted the question to the means of transporting the oil from the well to the refinery. And because the impact on greenhouse gas emissions by sending the gunk by pipeline won't be much different from that by sending it by train, well, therefore the project has no significant impact on greenhouse gases, no significant impact on global warming.

Put another way, the State Department considered the means of transportation but gave no thought to what it is that's being transported. It tried to change the subject and do it to the benefit of Big Oil.

As Jeffrey Sachs, Director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University put it, the report "self-portrays the US Government as a helpless bystander to climate calamity" and as "trapped in the Big Oil Status Quo."

And State maintained this attitude even as it was forced to acknowledge that the Keystone XL pipeline will drive tar sands expansion and therefore accelerate climate change - which was supposed to be the question under discussion, remember? When Obama addressed the pipeline, it was in the context of global warming.

This isn't the last word on the project and it still faces considerable opposition. But there are also powerful voices behind it and in the wake of the State Department report, they already are using it to push for a quick approval - no doubt fearing, with good reason, that delays will allow time for the failures and misdirections of the report to become more widely recognized.

But if, as I think is true, Obama wants to endorse the project but wants to find a way to do it without generating too much backlash from his environmentalist supporters, the danger is that this report could provide an opening to him to do it. And on climate change, that would be a disaster.

Sources:
http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/221135.pdf
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/03/obama-keystone-xl_n_4719401.html
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2012/03/left-side-of-aisle-50-part-1.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/keystone-the-pipeline-to_b_4716229.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-redford/reality-check-on-keystone_b_4719253.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/broad-coalition-backs-keystone-xl-oil-pipeline-22363514

145.5 - That Coke ad

That Coke ad

Speaking of being on the wrong side of history, some people certainly proved the point in their reactions to that Coca-Cola ad during the Super Bowl. I'm sure you know about it, but just in case you've been living in a cave for the past couple of weeks, it shows quick cuts of various people doing various things to a soundtrack of "America the Beautiful" sung in various languages, including, according to the website Language Log, English, Spanish, Keres Pueblo, Tagalog, Hindi, Senegalese French, and Hebrew.

And of course the right-wingers went ballistic with outrage at this horrible affront to "our" America, where "Speak English!" is the real national motto.

Perhaps the best response came from John McIntyre, a columnist for the Baltimore Sun, who said he was encouraged by the whole thing. The ad, he said, meant Coke had made a hard-headed business calculation that diversity is where their customers are and will be - and the loathsome reaction showed that the nativist white racists are on the losing side of the demographics and they know it.

But my favorite reaction came from Glenn Blech, who insisted he didn't like the ad because it was intended to "divide us politically."

"Because," he said, "that’s all this ad is... It’s in your face, and if you don’t like it, if you’re offended by it, you’re a racist."

Yes, you are.

Sources:
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=10142
http://deadspin.com/dumb-people-mad-at-multilingual-america-the-beautiful-1514567876
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/language-blog/bal-cocacola-and-white-outrage-20140204,0,5895928.story
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/03/glenn-beck-coca-cola-super-bowl-ad_n_4719005.html?ref=topbar

145.4 - Clown Award: North Carolina GOPpers

Clown Award: North Carolina GOPpers

Now it's time for the Clown Award, given for meritorious stupidity. This time it's a group award, going to all five Republican candidates in North Carolina vying for the party's nomination to challenge Sen. Kay Hagan this fall.

They all have been trying to out-wingnut each other. For example, two of them have suggested that Obama could be impeached. Not surprisingly, all five are anti-choice, differing only in just how extreme they would be in banning abortions. One of them equated the drive to do away with abortions rights with the end of slavery while another bragged about how last summer he go severe restrictions on abortion clinics passed by attaching them at the last minute to a bill on motorcycle safety.

All five favor a so-called "personhood" amendment to the US Constitution, which would endow not just fetuses but even zygotes with all the rights of actual people.

But all of that is really just typical wingnut stupidity. The Clown Award requires truly meritorious stupidity. So here it is: All five of these bozos say the state has the authority to ban contraceptives.

In 1965, the Supreme Court ruled in Griswold v. Connecticut that it was an invasion of Constitutionally-protected "marital privacy" for a state to ban the use of contraceptives by married couples. In 1972, in Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Court extended that logic to cover unmarried couples as well. That is, for 42 years it has been settled constitutional law that states cannot ban contraceptives. Forty-two years - and not one of these jackasses knew it.

That is stupidity truly worthy of the Clown Award.

Sources:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/03/abortion-north-carolina-senate_n_4718164.html?ref=topbar
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2013/07/left-side-of-aisle-119-part-1.html
http://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/News_Room/News_Releases/2012/Personhood_Measures
http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/01/31/3581067/abortion-question-divides-north.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstadt_v._Baird

145.3 - Update: Thomas Perkins has friends

Update: Thomas Perkins has friends

We have an update on last week's Outrage of the Week, which was about Thomas "$8 billion man" Perkins and his petulant crybaby whine about how the lower sorts were all hatin' on him and how he felt like a Jew in Nazi Germany except that later he said he shouldn't have said that except that he meant the message which if it means anything it means he thinks he is like a Jew in Nazi Germany, he just realized he shouldn't say it out loud in just those words.

Well, it turns out he has a lot of company, including Michelle "Really? Somebody Still Listens to Me?" Malkin, who sneered that criticism of Perkins came from a "bullying epidemic" engaged in by "the grievance industry" and from "bottomless hatred" against the rich.

Fox Business contributor Charles Payne blustered that the rich have "justified rage" and the only thing wrong with Perkins' comparison to Nazi Germany was that it "may be a couple of years ahead of the curve."

And the Wall Street Journal, where Perkins' letter was published, screeched in an editorial that the very fact that Perkins was criticized was proof that he was right about the rich being an oppressed minority and then went on a paranoid rant about "the left" was "siccing journalists to trash" such as the Koch brothers "and federal agencies to shut them down."

If I'd only known we had such power.

But the point again, is this is how they think of you: If you criticize them, it's because you hate them. If you resent that they get rich on your labor then throw you aside when you're no longer profitable to them and then they turn around and call you "lazy" when you can't find work, it means they are the threatened victims. If you think they should pay more in taxes because they can afford it in order to support the society that made their riches possible, it means you're just a jealous loser. This is how they think of you. And don't you ever forget it.

Sources:
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/tom-perkins-net-worth-2/
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/29/michelle-malkin-tires-to-reframe-income-inequal/197812
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/28/fox-analyst-defends-billionaires-paranoid-nazi/197801
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304691904579348791505926788?mod=ITP_opinion_2

145.2 - Good news 2: Iran sanctions bill stalls

Good news 2: Iran sanctions bill stalls

Our other bit of good news comes out of the Senate.

That Iran sanctions bill which I've talked about on a couple of occasions - you know, the one that would undermine negotiations between Iran and a group of mostly Western bullies wielding their Israel-driven paranoia about Iran's nuclear program - well, that bill has stalled.

After the initial flood of support in the Senate, where it looked as though it might get a veto-proof number of cosponsors, opposition stiffened from the White House, among the Democratic Party leadership in the Senate, and among the media and pundits, including some unlikely quarters.

Now, it appears it won't come up for a vote. Again, the negotiations with Iran consist of six nations bullying Iran over claims about a supposed Iranian nuclear weapons program, even though those nations have no hard proof that such a program even exists. Still, given the existing climate, undermining those negotiations would increase the possibility of a military confrontation with Iran lead by Israel or the US or both. So the failure of this bill is good news.

There are two significant points related to this that I wanted to add: One is that it showed a weakening of the political strength of the rabidly pro-Israel American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC. AIPAC is used to getting its way in Congress, often getting pro-Israel resolutions of one sort or another passed unanimously. This year, it helped get $3.1 billion in American aid for Israel and has largely framed the public debate over Iran’s nuclear program.

Getting this sanctions bill was a top legislative priority for the group, but it wound up going head to head with the White House, and it lost. In what can only be described as a full retreat, AIPAC has stopped pressing Senate Democrats to vote for the bill and even lamely claims that it never called for an immediate vote and what's more, the bill may yet pass at some point in the future if this and that and the other.

AIPAC's push on Iran sanctions increasingly allied it with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and against President Obama. Or, put another way, it became increasingly allied with Israeli policy and against US policy - which I say is also true of some of the supporters of the bill.

On another point, you may recall that I said that by supporting this bill, those Senators were saying that they don't want peace with Iran. Well, a couple of times today I'm going to say "I told you so" and here is the first. This is quoting from the New York Times' coverage:
Lawmakers confirm that the political climate on Capitol Hill has changed since the bill’s sponsors and Aipac made their push in December.

Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, a staunch supporter of Israel, is one of 16 Democrats who signed on to the bill.... Now Mr. Blumenthal says the Senate should hold off on a vote to give Mr. Obama breathing room for diplomacy.

“There’s been an unquestionable, undeniable shift in the perception of national security,” Mr. Blumenthal said. “I’m sensitive to the feelings, the resistance, the aversion of the general public to any kind of American military engagement.” [My emphasis.]
Which I say in essence admits that the bill was about precisely that: "American military engagement" against Iran. Not because it was good for US policy, not because Americans wanted it, but because Israel wanted it.

Frankly, for far too long US policy in the Middle East has been driven by the interests of Israel rather than the interests of the US or, far more importantly, what really matters, the interests of justice. Any sign of a political weakening on that front, including a weakening of AIPAC, is a step toward changing that - and that is good news.

Sources:
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2014/01/1434-update-iran.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/04/world/middleeast/potent-pro-israel-group-finds-its-momentum-blunted.html

145.1 - Good news 1: Even right-wingers coming around on marriage equality

Good news 1: Even right-wingers coming around on marriage equality

We'll start off, as we do whenever we can, with some good news. Our first bit of good news comes from an area where there has been a fair amount of good news over the last year: marriage equality. We have the surest sign yet that, as I have repeatedly predicted, this is an area where justice will come. And maybe even sooner than I thought.

An article at the online news site TalkingPointsMemo notes that less than two years ago, Witless Romney was saying he was against same-sex marriage and even civil unions and the chair of the Republican National Committee said that was in line with "most Americans."

But now, with polls showing a clear majority of Americans approving of same-sex marriage and even a majority of Republicans under the age of 50 doing so, the GOPpers are starting to realize that being on the wrong side of history is, let's just say, not in the party's best interests.

The result is that while some national GOPpers have voiced support for same-sex marriage, even more important is the conservative legislators at the state level who are, even if reluctantly, coming around to face reality. Some, like New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez, are just getting out of the way and letting marriage equality come to their states. Even more significantly, there are other legislators who are openly bucking the official party line.

One example the article cites is in Oregon. In 2004, an amendment to the state constitution define marriage as one man and one woman. Just three years later, the legislature passed a bill recognizing same-sex domestic partnerships. Now, there is what looks now like a successful move to have a referendum on the ballot this fall to overturn that constitutional amendment. What's relevant here is that Republicans in the state, including at least one sitting member of the legislature, are endorsing the effort and even recording videos in support.

Jim Moore, a political science professor at Pacific University, described the shift as "a sea change in the past 10 years" and predicts "a very good chance" for the initiative to pass.

Then there's Indiana, described by a top GOPper operative as "the last stand" of those trying to write bans on same-sex marriage into their state constitutions. And yes, there is a bill moving through the legislature for just such a constitutional ban. But even in Indiana, there is resistance among conservatives, including from a number of GOPper mayors in the state. Unhappily, that hasn't been enough so far to stop the bill, which has passed the state House and is moving to the state Senate. Still, 11 conservatives voted against it in the House, a figure that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.

And opponents did succeed in striking out the part of the bill that also would constitutionally ban civil unions and any other status "identical or substantially similar to that of marriage."

It all comes down to the same conclusion: Change is not only coming, it has come. Famous right-winger William F. Buckley, Jr., once described a conservative as someone "who is standing athwart history yelling 'Stop!'" But the fact is, there is only so long you can do that before history runs you over - and some of our right-wingers today are starting to realize that. And that is good news.

Sources:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/republicans-gay-marriage-support
http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20140126/NEWS/301260028/Republican-leaders-aim-end-gay-marriage-ban?gcheck=1&nclick_check=1
http://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2014/02/03/next-hjr-3-hearing-will-be-monday/5190625/
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/w/williamfb384475.html

Left Side of the Aisle #145




Left Side of the Aisle
for the week of Frbruary 6 - 12, 2014

This week:
Good news 1: Even right-wingers coming around on marriage equality
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/republicans-gay-marriage-support
http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20140126/NEWS/301260028/Republican-leaders-aim-end-gay-marriage-ban?gcheck=1&nclick_check=1
http://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2014/02/03/next-hjr-3-hearing-will-be-monday/5190625/
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/w/williamfb384475.html

Good news 2: Iran sanctions bill stalls
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/04/world/middleeast/potent-pro-israel-group-finds-its-momentum-blunted.html

Update: Thomas Perkins has friends
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/tom-perkins-net-worth-2/
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/29/michelle-malkin-tires-to-reframe-income-inequal/197812
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/28/fox-analyst-defends-billionaires-paranoid-nazi/197801
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304691904579348791505926788?mod=ITP_opinion_2

Clown Award: North Carolina GOPpers
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/03/abortion-north-carolina-senate_n_4718164.html?ref=topbar
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2013/07/left-side-of-aisle-119-part-1.html
http://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/News_Room/News_Releases/2012/Personhood_Measures
http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/01/31/3581067/abortion-question-divides-north.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstadt_v._Baird

That Coke ad
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=10142
http://deadspin.com/dumb-people-mad-at-multilingual-america-the-beautiful-1514567876
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/language-blog/bal-cocacola-and-white-outrage-20140204,0,5895928.story
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/03/glenn-beck-coca-cola-super-bowl-ad_n_4719005.html?ref=topbar

The State of the Keystone
http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/221135.pdf
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/03/obama-keystone-xl_n_4719401.html
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2012/03/left-side-of-aisle-50-part-1.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/keystone-the-pipeline-to_b_4716229.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-redford/reality-check-on-keystone_b_4719253.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/broad-coalition-backs-keystone-xl-oil-pipeline-22363514

Syria: Remember I told you so
http://whoviating.blogspot.com/2013/09/1262-scary-notion-that-president-can.html
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/11/us-syria-chemical-weapons-destruction
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25968616
http://www.opcw.org/
http://opcw.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=6576&ctl=Details&mid=10358&ItemID=19898&language=en-US
http://www.opcw.org/news/article/libya-completes-destruction-of-its-category-1-chemical-weapons/
http://www.hrw.org/node/122718/
http://www.hrw.org/

Outrage of the Week: Still how they think of you
http://jobsanger.blogspot.com/2014/01/bayer-ceo-thinks-poor-people-dont.html
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/01/26/3205861/pharmaceutical-ceo-cancer-drug-westerners-afford/
http://doctorswithoutborders.org/events/symposiums/2012-lives-in-the-balance/assets/files/Medical-Innovations-for-Neglected-Patients.pdf
http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/

Friday, January 31, 2014

144.6 - Outrage of the Week: how the rich think of you

Outrage of the Week: how the rich think of you

Okay, let's wrap things up with our other regular feature, the Outrage of the Week.

Start with some facts: long-term unemployment is the worst ever, tens of millions continue to live in poverty, while real wages stagnate or fall. Over the so-called "economic recovery" period of 2009-2012, the incomes of the richest 1% went up by 32% while the incomes of the other 99% went up 0.4% - put another way, 95% of the gains went to the 1%, leaving 5% for everyone else.

In 2012, the top 10% got half of all income in the United States, surpassing even the peak of the stock market bubble in the "roaring '20s." The richest 1% got 22.5% - nearly a quarter - of all national income. Five years after the financial collapse, few outside the very richest are anything but worse off.

But who are we supposed to feel sorry for? Who is supposed to feel our concern? The rich. The poor, besieged, maligned rich.

The latest in a long line of sniveling whiners blubbering about how hard it is to live with their yachts and mansions because people are so mean to me! is one Thomas Perkins, a venture capitalist worth about $8 billion, who, it seems, lives in constant fear of the unwashed hordes coming to get him.

In a recent letter to the editor he wrote to the Wall Street Journal, he said, these are quotes,
I would call attention to the parallels of fascist Nazi Germany to its war on its “one percent,” namely its Jews, to the progressive war on the American one percent, namely the “rich.” ...

I perceive a rising tide of hatred of the successful one percent. ...

This is a very dangerous drift in our American thinking. Kristallnacht was unthinkable in 1930; is its descendent “progressive” radicalism unthinkable now?
That's right, according to Thomas Perkins, being a multi-billionaire in the US in 2013 is just like being a Jew in Nazi Germany.

And in case you thought he was drunk or doping or that he would "clarify" because he "misspoke"- or "miswrote," I suppose - you'd be wrong. In a subsequent email to Bloomberg, he declared that “In the Nazi era it was racial demonization, now it is class demonization.” Of course, he is the one engaging in "class demonization," proposing that everybody poorer than him is a real or potential Nazi, but folks like him are often irony-challenged.

After a day of being ridiculed, he "apologized" for the use of the word Kristallnacht but not, he insisted for "the message." I'm not sure exactly what that's supposed to change.

The important point here, however, is that he is by no means alone. He's just the latest. David Sirota offered a few more:

-Supermarket mogul John Catsimatidis reacted to a proposal to raise taxes on the rich by comparing it to how "Hitler punished the Jews."

-Private equity mogul Steven Schwarzman called a proposal to tax private equity income at the same rate as other income "like when Hitler invaded Poland."

-When Sen. Chuck Schumer offered a bill to close tax loopholes abused primarily by the super-rich, Grover Norquist, who said that "The Nazis were for high marginal tax rates," claimed Shumer probably just translated a law from 1930s Germany.

-And you may remember this one: AIG CEO Robert Benmosche swearing that anger over his bailed-out company’s bonuses was “just as bad” as lynchings of African Americans in the Jim Crow South.

This is how they think of you. This is how they think of you: an inchoate, threatening, mass of failures jealous of their success. In their minds, the 85 people who hold as much wealth as 3.5 billion people are not grasping, selfish, insanely rich "winners" whose riches are built on the hard work of a multitude of others because whether you like it or not, bozo, no, you didn't build that, they are a persecuted diaspora in constant risk of annihilation.

Well, for my part, I can't wait for the day when their nightmare comes true, at least in the cultural sense. For the moment, I'll confine myself to saying that people such as Thomas Perkins and the rest are morally degenerate outrages.

Sources:
http://www.msnbc.com/all/the-rich-got-richer-the-99-not-so-much
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/25/wealthy_venture_capitalist_tom_perkins_says_the_1_in_america_are_treated_like_jews_in_nazi_germany/
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304549504579316913982034286
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/27/thomas-perkins-doubles-down-holocaust_n_4674266.html
http://pando.com/2014/01/26/disingenuous-basterds-the-oligarchs-long-campaign-to-depict-their-critics-as-nazis/

144.5 - Global warming: It's going to get worse

Global warming: It's going to get worse

Probably the best single line in the entire State of the Union speech was "Climate change is a fact." What made it special was the direct, matter-of-fact way it was said, something rarely done by politicians. Obama pledged to, in the words of Washington Post columnist Ryan Cooper, finish what he has started. And, indeed, there are things he can do by executive order, things entirely within his authority as president, to reduce our national output of greenhouse gases.

The problem is, as is all too often true with President Hopey-Changey, we've heard it before. Just a year ago, at his second-term inaugural, he said “We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations.” Which was followed by - what? Yes, there were a couple of good moves, such as calling on the EPA to set new standards for carbon emissions from power plants - but months later, the rule still isn't finalized. Once again, the words soar, the deeds crawl. And we don't have time to crawl. We don't have time for "eventually."

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, has found that 2013 tied for the fourth hottest year on record around the world. Those records date back to 1880.

NASA, which calculates records in a different manner, said 2013 was the seventh hottest on record - but both agencies said nine of the 10th warmest years on record have happened in the 21st century. What's more, the 13 years of this century, 2001-2013, are all among the 15 hottest years recorded, with the hottest year worldwide being 2010.

And it's going to get worse.

According to a new study by researchers in Australia, at the rate the Earth is currently warming, temps will rise a full 4 degrees Celsius by 2100, twice the amount of warming that climatologists say can be tolerated without severe, damaging effects to the environment on which humans depend - and a number of those scientists say even that 2 degree limit is too high.

To make it even more depressing, the researchers note that while climate models certainly are not perfect, the mistakes they are often making is in predicting less warming than actually occurs rather than more.

The effects of climate change are already being seen. Until recently, climatologists have been very careful to avoiding connecting particular extreme weather events to global warming, but increasingly, that is no longer true. For one example, a study recently published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Climate Change concludes that the current rate of carbon emissions would mean twice as many extreme El Niños over the next 100 years as there would have been otherwise, with profound socioeconomic consequences. The last extreme El Niño, in 1997-98, resulted in the hottest year on record, and the accompanying floods, cyclones, droughts, and wildfires killed an estimated 23,000 people and caused scores of billions of dollars in damage, particularly to food production.

If the paper's conclusions are borne out by further study, it would be devastating because the change would be, in the words of the chief researcher, "essentially an 'irreversible' climate change phenomenon, and it would take a dramatic reduction in greenhouse emissions over a number of generations to reduce the impact."

We, the adult generations of today, have to suck it up and realize that we have to change our ways dramatically and we have to do it now; we have to accept some inconvenience in our lives or our children and even more our grandchildren will pay a severe, even a catastrophic, price. We have no time for eventually. We have no time for "later." We have no time to crawl.

Sources:
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/obama-climate-change-is-a-fact-7Uwc4lz4RwefZFRXQNSTwA.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/01/28/in-the-state-of-the-union-obama-pledges-strong-action-on-climate/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/01/22/finally-a-reason-for-a-bit-of-optimism-about-climate-change/
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/29/climate_change_by_the_numbers_the_worst_is_yet_to_come/
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/noaa-world-in-2013-was-4th-hottest-on-record
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/02/earth_set_to_warm_a_catastrophic_4_degrees_by_the_end_of_the_century/?source=newsletter
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/19/unchecked-global-warming-double-el-nino-weather

144.4 - Clown Award: Susanne Atanus

Clown Award: Susanne Atanus

It might come as a surprise to some of you out there, but I expect it won't to some, that creationism - the notion that the Earth is only 6000-something years old and the evolution doesn't exist and that god created everything just the way it is - is being taught in science classes in schools across much of the country. There are at least hundreds of schools that are, in essence, using the Bible as a science textbook.

And I'm not referring to private fundamentalist religious schools, but to taxpayer-supported schools. Charter schools and even, in some cases, public schools.

In Texas, a publicly-funded charter school system operating 65 campuses (with plans for 20 more this year) does it - with no need to be coy about it, because the state science education standards allow teachers to present "alternatives" to evolution, with the result that the opening line of the workbook section on the topic is, quoting, “In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth.”

Recent laws in Louisiana and Tennessee allow teachers in any public school in those states to, again, teach “alternatives” to evolution. In Florida, Indiana, Ohio, Arizona, Washington, DC, and elsewhere, taxpayer money is is funding creationist private schools through tuition vouchers or scholarship programs.

And what does this kind of thinking produce? What does it lead to? It leads to this week's edition of one of our regular weekly features, the Clown Award, given for meritorious stupidity.

Susanne Atanus is one of two candidates for the GOPper nomination to challenge Democratic Rep. Jan Schakowsky for her seat this year. She describes herself as "a conservative Republican" who believes in "God first."

She sure does. During what the suburban Chicago Daily Herald called an "endorsement session" both candidates had with the paper's editorial board on January 20, she declared that she believes God controls the weather and has put tornadoes and diseases such as autism and dementia on Earth as punishment for gay rights and legalized abortions. "God is angry," she said.

Actually, Susie, if there was a god, I suspect most of that supreme anger would be directed at twits like you. She was bad enough that state and local GOPper officials insisted that the party has nothing to do with her.

Her opponent in the primary is no prize, a Ron Paul supporter who favors doing away with all income taxes and replacing them with a 23% national sales tax, opposes raising the minimum wage, and - oh yeah - has an outstanding domestic violence protection order against him. But it takes real skill to rise to the level that Susanne Atanus has achieved. Susanne Atanus: champion-level clown.

Sources:
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/01/creationism_in_texas_public_schools_undermining_the_charter_movement.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/01/creationism_in_public_schools_mapped_where_tax_money_supports_alternatives.html
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/23/1271963/-Illinois-Republican-says-God-makes-tornadoes-to-punish-gay-people
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/23/booted-from-illinois-gop-susan-atanus-anti-lgbt-comments-spark-rage/

144.3 - The discovery of COINTELPRO: March 8, 1971

The discovery of COINTELPRO: March 8, 1971

Talking about Pete Seeger and activism and commitment kind of lead me into something else I wanted to talk about.

The fact is, government spying on us is nothing new and neither is active attempts by that government to disrupt or better yet undermine opposition.

During The Dreaded '60s, there was a lot of talk in the movement about government agent provocateurs and a sometimes irritating number of half-serious remarks about paranoia - which became even more irritating when they became more than half-serious. The boldest course, pursued by many, even most, was simply to assume you were being watched and just do whatever it was you were going to do anyway. At one point in the 1970s it was estimated that the FBI had files on about 7 million activists and the joke became how disappointed you would be if you found out that you were not among them.

The FBI field office in Media, PA in 1971
Anyway, the point here is that on March 8, 1971, a group of anti-war activists calling themselves the Citizens’ Commission to Investigate the FBI broke into the FBI field office in Media, Pennsylvania and made off with hundreds of pages of secret counterintelligence files, which they released to the media.

The documents proved the existence of exactly the sort of program that activists had suspected. It was called COINTELPRO - for Counter-Intelligence Program - and was devoted to destroying a range of peace, civil rights, New Left, student, and black power groups that the FBI's deranged director, J. Edgar Hoover, believed were out to destroy America!

Under the plan, the FBI spied, infiltrated, and wiretapped. It planted rumors, intimidated activists with repeated rounds of questioning intended to, quoting Hoover's memo, "enhance the paranoia endemic in these circles" mad make them thing "there is an FBI agent behind every mailbox." It used agents provocateurs to spark internal dissension or provoke groups into actions that would discredit them. It sent out anonymous letters, including one notorious one that tried to blackmail Martin Luther King, Jr. into committing suicide.

Hoover was enraged by the revelations and sent out 200 FBI agents to track down the people involved. They failed. The case was never solved and the FBI finally gave up, closing the case two days after the statute of limitations had expired.

Now, nearly 43 years later, five of the group have come forward and a book on the event, called The Burglary, has come out this month. I haven't read it yet, but I fully intend to do so. Let it be a reminder that while the scope of the spying today is orders of magnitude beyond that of - or even possible in - the 1950s and '60s, the viciousness of that era has yet to be repeated. But as long as the capability is there, the threat remains. And because of that orders-of-magnitude difference in scope, what could be unleashed at any time now would likewise be far worse than that which we survived - and struck back against - then.

I have two final notes about this. One is that both the Washington Post and NBC try, at least implicitly, to take credit as being the first to publish stories about what the papers liberated from the FBI revealed. In fact, the first was probably a little pacifist magazine called "WIN," which was published in cooperation with the War Resisters League.

The other note is a personal one: One of the first articles I read about the people coming forward said that the break-in was "the brainchild of William Davidon, a physics professor as Haverford College near Philadelphia...."

Wait. Stop. William Davidon? Bill Davidon?

I knew him. I worked with him on antiwar stuff. I worked with his wife, Ann Morrisset Davidon, on the National Committee of the War Resisters League. He never mentioned his role. Not once. A good part of the reason the folks were never caught was that they agreed in advance that after quickly preparing the papers for release they would never again meet as a group (they never did) and that they would never speak of their role (they didn't).

So it turns out that I knew the guy who was the brains behind the operation that proved massive spying by the FBI on peaceful dissent. Cool. And I never knew it.

Sources:
http://www.examiner.com/article/burglary-of-fbi-office-did-not-stop-cointelpro-tampering-of-omaha-two-trial
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2014/01/media_pa_fbi_break_in_revelations_what_we_can_learn_from_them_about_intelligence.html
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/07/fbi-1971-burglary-hold-government-accountable
http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/08/22220561-nbc-reporter-recounts-breaking-fbi-spying-story?lite&google_editors_picks=true
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/07/fbi-office-break-in-1971-come-forward-documents
http://www.theburglary.com/
http://www.swarthmore.edu/Library/peace/DG100-150/dg144davidon.htm

144.2 - RIP: Pete Seeger

RIP: Pete Seeger

We're going to spend a couple of minutes remembering someone who was probably as close to a living legend as we get these days: Pete Seeger, who died January 27 at the age of 94.

An article about his music in the San Jose Mercury News said it best: Pete Seeger was folk music. He was, very likely more than any other person or influence, responsible for much of America discovering - or, rather, rediscovering - its folk roots. The Weavers, a quartet started in 1948 consisting of Seeger, Lee Hays, Ronnie Gilbert, and Fred Hellerman, certainly set the stage with hits (yes, actual hits) such as “Goodnight Irene,” ”Tzena, Tzena” and “On Top of Old Smokey.”

But Pete Seeger wasn't just about preserving the past in a glass jar. As an example, I remember hearing the story that one time, during the folk revival of the 1960s, he heard someone complain that people were writing new folk songs rather than preserving the old ones. He answered "Don't interfere with the folk process." He has been credited with popularizing “We Shall Overcome,” which became the anthem of the civil rights movement, and he wrote or co-wrote "If I Had a Hammer," "Turn, Turn, Turn," "Where Have All the Flowers Gone," and "Kisses Sweeter Than Wine."

He dropped out of Harvard in 1938 and hit the road, hitchhiking and hopping freights around the country, learning folk songs as he went. By 1940, he was part of a group performing benefits for disaster relief and other causes.

He and his friend Woody Guthrie toured migrant camps and union halls. He sang on overseas radio broadcasts for the Office of War Information early in World War II. In the Army, he entertained soldiers in the South Pacific. As the years went on, he sang in support of workers and for peace and against racism, the death penalty, and nuclear power. He never stopped singing or performing in a career that spanned 70 years.

Perhaps one of his proudest moments - or at least it would be one of mine if it were me - came in August 1955 when he faced down the House Un-American Activities Committee, or HUAC, a Congressional panel aimed at uncovering the commies they insisted were under every bed. The Committee kept demanding to know if he sang to this Communist Party group or that Communist Party gathering or at the other Community Party benefit. He simply refused to answer. Wait, the Committee said, are you pleading the Fifth Amendment? No, I'm not, he said. I just won't tell you. I'll tell you about my songs but I'm not going to tell you where I sang them or who I sang them to because you have no business asking. Finally, they gave up.

He was charged with 10 counts of contempt of Congress and sentenced to a year in prison. The conviction was overturned on appeal, but as a result of his defiance he was blackballed for TV and from recording contacts for over 10 years - until in 1967 the Smothers Brothers had him on. Controversy came along with his appearance: CBS deleted his Vietnam protest song, “Waist Deep in the Big Muddy,” with what became its famous refrain, "We're waist deep in the Big Muddy; the big fool says to push on." Five months later, he came back on and did it, but even then at least one station censored the last verse.

In the late '60s, he founded the group Clearwater to support the sloop of the same name built by volunteers which sailed up and down the Hudson River, raising money and awareness for cleaning up the river.

By the 1990s, he was being heaped with honors. He performed at the Kennedy Center in 1994. He was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1996. In 2006, Bruce Springsteen did an album in his honor. In 2009, he was treated to - and performed in - a concert at Madison Square Garden to mark his 90th birthday.

He was an activist to the end: In 2011, at the age of 92, he walked two miles through Manhattan as part of an Occupy Movement march and protest. His ever-present banjo was actually not present as he had to use two canes to walk - but walk he did.

His wife Toshi, a remarkable woman in her own right, died in July at the age of 91, just 11 days short of their 70th anniversary.

And now this - as someone accurately dubbed him - "ever-so-gentle rabble-rouser" has rejoined her.

Personally, I never thought all that much of Pete Seeger as a singer, but his compassion, his conviction, and his conscience - to put that more picturesquely, his soul - more than made up for it. “Be wary of great leaders,” he said after the Occupy march. “Hope that there are many, many small leaders.” On that basis, he did his part - more than his part.

RIP, Pete Seeger.

Sources:
http://www.mercurynews.com/music/ci_25010549/pete-seeger-folk-legends-essential-songs
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/28/legendary_folk_singer_activist_pete_seeger_dies_at_94/?source=newsletter
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/01/28/pete_seeger_huac_transcript_full_text_of_anti_communist_hearing_courtesy.html?google_editors_picks=true
http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/toshi-seeger-wife-muse-and-ally-of-pete-seeger-dies-at-91/2013/07/11/440dd81e-ea48-11e2-8f22-de4bd2a2bd39_story.html

144.1 - Good news: Some federally-contracted workers to get $10.10 minimum wage

Good news: Some federally-contracted workers to get $10.10 minimum wage

We have some sorta good news to start off the day. Before the State of the Union speech, I saw a headline along the lines of "leftists and progressives prepare themselves to be disappointed in the speech." And lo and behold, we weren't disappointed - about being disappointed. Like way too much of what comes out of President Hopey-Changey, there was a lot of lofty talk and almost no specifics, a lot of "I will do this and I will do that by executive order" without actually doing any of it.

With one exception, and that's the good news.

Under an executive order announced by the White House in advance of the speech, some low-wage, federally-contracted workers will have a new minimum wage of $10.10 per hour. The full scope of the program is not yet clear, but it could mean a raise of up to $2.85 an hour for hundreds of thousands of workers under future federal contracts.

But you'll notice that already the effect has been limited: It applies to future contracts, not to current ones and doesn't even apply to renewals of current ones unless other other terms are changed.

What's more, it fails to address the other two issues raised by groups like Good Jobs Nation, the outfit organizing the rapid-fire one day strikes by federally-contracted workers such as, to cite an example from last week, the one by non-union cleaning and concessions workers at the Pentagon. The other two concerns are to strengthen enforcement of labor law against scofflaw contractors and beef up workers’ organizing rights because without those, the increased pay will mean little to those facing employer illegalities and retaliation as they struggle to form unions so they can raise themselves up rather than having to depend on future executive orders.

Still, despite the order's shortcomings and limitations and failures - something which always seems to be true of any supposed improvements coming out of the White House which sound great until you check the details - let's still take some pleasure in the fact that anyone's minimum pay is being raised and especially take pleasure in the knowledge that it was militant labor action over the past several months that made it happen.

[Note: The image is not of the labor action at the Pentagon but of an earlier one at a federally-run museum. Same type of workers, same concerns, same demands, part of the same effort, but different time and place and used to illustrate the "militant labor action over the past several months."]

Sources:
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/28/strike_wave_spurs_obama_to_make_contractors_pay_10_10/
http://www.aol.com/article/2014/01/28/obama-to-lift-minimum-wage-for-federal-contractors-white-house/20817542/?icid=maing-grid7|htmlws-sb-bb|dl3|sec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D435684
http://goodjobsnation.org/
http://goodjobsnation.org/breaking-pentagon-workers-strike-over-poverty-pay/

Left Side of the Aisle #144




Left Side of the Aisle
for the week of January 30 - February 5, 2014

This week:

Good news: Some federally-contracted workers to get $10.10 minimum wage
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/28/strike_wave_spurs_obama_to_make_contractors_pay_10_10/
http://www.aol.com/article/2014/01/28/obama-to-lift-minimum-wage-for-federal-contractors-white-house/20817542/?icid=maing-grid7|htmlws-sb-bb|dl3|sec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D435684
http://goodjobsnation.org/
http://goodjobsnation.org/breaking-pentagon-workers-strike-over-poverty-pay/

RIP: Pete Seeger
http://www.mercurynews.com/music/ci_25010549/pete-seeger-folk-legends-essential-songs
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/28/legendary_folk_singer_activist_pete_seeger_dies_at_94/?source=newsletter
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/01/28/pete_seeger_huac_transcript_full_text_of_anti_communist_hearing_courtesy.html?google_editors_picks=true
http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/music/toshi-seeger-wife-muse-and-ally-of-pete-seeger-dies-at-91/2013/07/11/440dd81e-ea48-11e2-8f22-de4bd2a2bd39_story.html

The discovery of COINTELPRO: March 8, 1971
http://www.examiner.com/article/burglary-of-fbi-office-did-not-stop-cointelpro-tampering-of-omaha-two-trial
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2014/01/media_pa_fbi_break_in_revelations_what_we_can_learn_from_them_about_intelligence.html
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/07/fbi-1971-burglary-hold-government-accountable
http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/08/22220561-nbc-reporter-recounts-breaking-fbi-spying-story
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/07/fbi-office-break-in-1971-come-forward-documents
http://www.theburglary.com/
http://www.swarthmore.edu/Library/peace/DG100-150/dg144davidon.htm

Clown Award: Susanne Atanus
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/01/creationism_in_texas_public_schools_undermining_the_charter_movement.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/01/creationism_in_public_schools_mapped_where_tax_money_supports_alternatives.html
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/23/1271963/-Illinois-Republican-says-God-makes-tornadoes-to-punish-gay-people
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/23/booted-from-illinois-gop-susan-atanus-anti-lgbt-comments-spark-rage/

Global warming: It's going to get worse
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/obama-climate-change-is-a-fact-7Uwc4lz4RwefZFRXQNSTwA.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/01/28/in-the-state-of-the-union-obama-pledges-strong-action-on-climate/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/01/22/finally-a-reason-for-a-bit-of-optimism-about-climate-change/
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/29/climate_change_by_the_numbers_the_worst_is_yet_to_come/
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/noaa-world-in-2013-was-4th-hottest-on-record
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/02/earth_set_to_warm_a_catastrophic_4_degrees_by_the_end_of_the_century/
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/19/unchecked-global-warming-double-el-nino-weather

Outrage of the Week: how the rich think of you
http://www.msnbc.com/all/the-rich-got-richer-the-99-not-so-much
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/25/wealthy_venture_capitalist_tom_perkins_says_the_1_in_america_are_treated_like_jews_in_nazi_germany/
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304549504579316913982034286
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/27/thomas-perkins-doubles-down-holocaust_n_4674266.html
http://pando.com/2014/01/26/disingenuous-basterds-the-oligarchs-long-campaign-to-depict-their-critics-as-nazis/
 
// I Support The Occupy Movement : banner and script by @jeffcouturer / jeffcouturier.com (v1.2) document.write('
I support the OCCUPY movement
');function occupySwap(whichState){if(whichState==1){document.getElementById('occupyimg').src="https://sites.google.com/site/occupybanners/home/isupportoccupy-right-blue.png"}else{document.getElementById('occupyimg').src="https://sites.google.com/site/occupybanners/home/isupportoccupy-right-red.png"}} document.write('');